Quantcast
Channel: Classical Physics
Viewing all 57941 articles
Browse latest View live

What is the limit of classical electrodynamics?

$
0
0
Hello everyone,

I was wondering about the following question:

Under what condition(s) could one say that the interaction between an electron and an electromagnetic wave is not governed anymore by the laws of classical electrodynamics?

I would also be glad if someone could point out any good references on this topic. I've been searching for some time already but with not much luck...!

Thank you very much.

complex form of poisson equation

$
0
0
Hi,

I am trying to solve the complex form of poisson equation ∇[ε(x)∇V(x)] = -1/εo ρ(x)
with complex permittivity.

If I introduce complex permittivity ε = εr - j σ/(εow), then I must introduce a complex potential ,V = Vr + jVi.
That means the charge density, ρ, must also take a complex form, but I'm not sure what to make of that.

For my boundary conditions, I have the real part of the voltage measured from the oscilloscope, and the real charge density I compute through the conservation equations.

Any help on this topic? I can't find much on this on internet.
Thanks!

Question About Measuring Specific Heat Capacity

$
0
0
Recently, I did a physics lab experiment to find the specific heat capacity of an unknown sample material. The lab instructions kept insisting that the sample had to be kept in boiling water for at least 10 minutes. My question is why? Could I have found the specific heat capacity if the sample were just placed in hot--but not boiling--water for 10 minutes?

Thermally induced stress

$
0
0
When a bar is heated evenly, and it expands freely, they say it has zero induced stress. How about the stored energy? Isn't some energy stored in the process of expansion? Can this energy be calculated the same way the elastic energy is calculated? If so, why we state that it has zero stress?

Thanks.

Lighting strikes

$
0
0
I don't know if this is in the right section but here goes any way

when lighting strikes does it create a magnetic wave and or an EMP?

What is Restrahlen effect and Restrahlen band?

$
0
0
I search it on google, books, articles, everyone cite it but noone explain fully what it is. If you can: bibliography please! Thanks a lot!

Submarine Modeling

$
0
0
Hello, I'm working on a project, and my teacher gave me something to think about, but im at a loss. He wants me to come up with an equation to model the maximum height a submarine can go underwater, if it can withstand a maximum pressure of 80kpa. I started thinking it was an integral problem, integ(dP/dz) but i'm not sure. Any help would be much appreciated.

Colors of thin layers of materials

$
0
0
Hi everyone.

I have the following question: on passivated copper sheets used under high electric fields I found some color patterns I can't really explain. A possible explanation would be that there are some thin layers of material on top of pure copper, for instance the copper dioxide coming from the passivation, whose thickness changes, thus inducing interference patterns.
However, the equation for thin film interference (e.g. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin-film_interference) depends on the angle of incidence of light:
2*n*d*cosθ = mλ,

where:
n = refraction index of the material
d = thickness of the layer
θ = incidence angle of incoming light
λ = light wavelength
m = integer number

So my assumption is that, if it really were all about thin layers of some material, depending on my position I should see different color patterns, and at some spots none!
However, as the colors on the surface of the copper sheets remain unchanged, no matter what position I'm looking from, I think it's not about thin layers, rather about pollutants.
Can somebody give me a clue?

Thank you very much!

Confusion on Newton's 3rd law!!

$
0
0
According to the 3rd law, the equal and opposite forces are acting on two different bodies and therefore cannot cancel each other. They are mutual forces. Why then, so we say the force of gravity on say, a book on a table, and the normal force acting on the book by the table, is an example of the 3rd law? They are forces acting on one thing (the book) and are not triggered by each other. Also, hence they cancel each other out. So how is it an example of the third law?

will, Red, Green and blue lasers wen crossed create the spectrum we crossed ??

$
0
0
hia,

if i get red, green and blue lasers, and cross them at one point, and change the intensity of each one accordingly, will at the point of where they cross, display different colours relevant to the mixture of said lasers, ??

Thank you

Total Internal Reflection

$
0
0
When we talk about Snell's law, and total internal reflection in particular, we usually will draw diagrams as if light is coming off a point in a single, straight line (that bends at an interface, of course).

My question is, though, how does this light behave when it's coming off an extended object? For example, if I stand at the side of a pool and there is a person, say, under the surface, then how do I know whether or not I will see him? If the light that hits my eyes comes from beyond the critical angle, then I shouldn't be able to see anything from under the water there. But isn't it possible that some of the light he emits (well, reflects but it's as if he emits it) will come from above the critical angle while some will come below it?

As in, shouldn't the diagram we draw of light coming from this person really include lines going at all angles up to surface, some from every angle, and then once they hit the interface they will bend according to Snell's law, but rays from seemingly many different points will reach my eyes, not just from one as we usually draw in diagrams?

This is also what often confused me about deriving Snell's law from Fermat's principle-- how can we single out an individual line of light and ignore all the others? Not all light reaching my eyes goes through a single point on the interface, does it?

Coil design and magnet orientation in a unique generator

$
0
0
First, I am not an electrical engineer - I am a hobbyist building a prototype linear-stlye generator based on an idea I had which, for various reasons, cannot be built with magnets that pass completely inside of coil(s) like most of the ones I have seen described for wave energy capture and other reciprocating motions. I understand the basic concepts of electromagnetism and have read a great deal, but I can't find anything which describes the factors I would like to know about in any detail.

I did find one company, Windtronics who have a wind generator that has some of the same constraints as what I am working under. Their 'BTPS' (blade tip power system) has magnets that move past coils in a fixed housing, and since the magnets are attached to the rim of the wind vane assembly, they can't be completely enclosed by the coils.

Unfortunately, none of the drawings I have found of their device clearly show how the magnets and coils are oriented with respect to each other - which is the question I have: How would you orient magnets at the end of a spoke or arm that moves near coils (and what orientation should these coils with respect to the end-of-arm magnets, and how should they be wired together) so that the result has the maximum electrical generation efficiency?

I can envision many possible configurations, but wanted to solicit some expert guidance before wasting a lot of time building something sub-optimal. Any pointers or discussion are welcomed.

Lagrangian with friction.

$
0
0
I saw a thread early which said use a like quadratic dissapative force. However I wonderig if for simple situation like on a one day motion that adding an F_r times x term under the potential energy work as well. Mathematically it worked for me in the past but I never used it in a test situation. I know that it's not a conservative force but it's gets something like a potential.

Speed of atoms ejected from an oven

$
0
0
My question is this: what is the average speed of atoms released from an oven at some temperature T? For example, in a Stern-Gerlach experiment, hydrogen atoms are emitted from an oven and collimated into a beam by passing them through a slit (and then sent into an inhomogenous magnetic field, but I don't really care about these details for this particular question).

The reason I am confused about this is because my gut instinct would be to estimate this using the old thermodynamic expression for an ideal gas: E = 3/2 kT = 1/2 mv^2 which would imply [tex]v=\sqrt{\frac{3kT}{m}}[/tex]
However, upon cracking open my thermodynamics textbook, it seems as though this is the RMS speed of atoms in a gas, rather than the boring-old average speed. The boring old average speed is found by calculating the expectation value of speed in the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, as such:
[tex]\langle v \rangle = \int_0^{\infty} v \, f(v) \, dv= \sqrt { \frac{8kT}{\pi m}} [/tex]
They are very close: the factor of 3 just changes to 8/∏. But which one should I use in a Stern-Gerlach question? Which one would actually be observed in a collimated beam of atoms emitted from an oven at temperature T?

Edit: Just to clarify, even though I am using the symbol v, which is usually reserved for the velocity, here I am referring to the speed, which is equal to the magnitude of the velocity vector. That is to say, v=|v|.

Few Fundamental Thermodynamics Questions

$
0
0
Hi

I had a few thermodynamics questions on a thread that was locked. The link is here and my questions are directed at the last post.

http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=225555

Quote:

Quasistatic irreversible processes can always be realized in a completely reversible way. E.g. in the above case where the entropy of the gas increases due to absorbing heat, the heat can be supplied to the gas by a heat bath and the temperature difference between the heat bath and the gas can be made arbitrarily small. The entropy increase of the heat bath plus the entropy increase of the heat bath is then zero. The entire process is then reversible.
1. Does the author mean that all quasistatic irreversble processes are reversible or if for a quasistatic irreversible process that goes from state 1 to 2, there is actually another way to get from state 1 to 2 reversibly? Is there some kind of proof that this generalization is true as I can't find it in any books?

2. With regards to the proof for work for non-quasistatic systems, does the proof apply to quasistatic irreversible process as well? On page 17 of Anderson's modern compressible flow, he states that only for reversible process does W = integral of pdV. In addition, I thought that equation (5) that T dS >= dQ used to prove W < integral pdv also applies for any irreversible process quasistatic or not?

Quote:

An exteme example is free expansion of a gas in avacuum. In that case no work at all is performed, but this process is so violent that you can object by saying that the pressure of the gas is not well defined. But we can perform a free expansion in small steps by moving a piston very fast from one position to a slighly different position, faster than the gas can expand and then fixing the piston in that position.

Then what happens is that the gas expands and bumps into the piston in that new position. The P dV term is then equal to the increase in kinetic energy of the gas which comes at the expense of the internal energy, but this kinetic energy gets dissipated after a while, so the internal energy stays the same.
3. I'm a bit confused here because I always thought that internal energy was a measure of all the microscopic energies which includes kinetic energy (and that kinetic energy directly correlates to the temperature of gas)?

4. I was also wondering for a real gas (intermolecular forces important) or a chemically reacting system, why is internal energy also a function of specific volume and enthalpy a function of pressure while this isn't the case for ideal gas and non-chemical reacting system?

5. How are irreversibilities accounted for in terms of energy balance for closed or open systems? For a closed and insulated piston cylinder and W < integral PdV, does energy balance become something like:

W = U2 - U1 = integral PdV - loss

So for closed systems do losses get accounted for in the internal energy of the final state and for steady state open systems does losses get accounted for in the enthalpy terms (assuming adiabatic processes)?

6. Is there an example that shows how heat is process dependent, in all the books I looked through they only give examples for work but just simply state this for heat without examples?

7. What is the difference between equilibrium and steady state in a general thermodynamics sense?

Thanks very much

Good explanation of aeroelastic flutter

$
0
0
After looking into the Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse, I tried to find out what this thing called aeorelastic flutter is and what causes it. Unfortunately, I didn't get a very good answer for either question, especially the latter one, and was hoping someone could help me out.

Solving inclined plane in different axis.

$
0
0
I can work out the acceleration of a block that will take along the plane when the axes are the ones along and perpendicular to the inclined plane. But, when I choose a horizontal and vertical axis I end up with the same mistake as this guy in this thread did:

http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=238180

In that thread, it is said that the vertical forces don't add up to zero. I don't get it and hence I cannot solve the problem when the axis is horizontal and vertical. Can anyone help?

Is the energy conserved FOR EACH BODY in a two-body central force problem?

$
0
0
Hi everyone,

I would like to know if the energy of each body of a two body gravitationnal problem is separately conserved. I know that the individual angular momentum are separately conserved and that the TOTAL energy of the two bodies is conserved. However, I don't know if there could be energy transfer between the two bodies or if it's forbidden by symmetry considerations.

In my mechanics textbook, the two-body central force problem is only treated as a one-dimensional problem of the motion of a reduced mass in an effective potential, where only the energy of a reduced mass orbiting around the center of mass is considered. This confuses me when I try to think of the energy of ONE of the two bodies. Is the energy of ONE of the two bodies conserved? Is there a way to see this?

Thank you a lot for considering my request. Best regards,

Kami

Thermodynamics for a geothermal heat pump

$
0
0
I'm going a bit off the reservation to try something experimental when I attempt my own HVAC installation and I'm having some trouble determining a few things. I want to transfer heat from water flowing in a 3/4" copper tube that is submersed in a larger body of water.

The copper pipe has a wall thickness of .035" so that makes an inside diameter of .68". I'd like to determine how much heat I can transfer in a 100' length of pipe for every gallon per minute flow. Being that I know just enough to be dangerous, I'm not comfortable with many of the various units, so don't laugh at my selection of units. :) My calculations show 1.887 gallons of water are in that pipe at any one time.

So to make things conceptually simple (I think it does?) lets assume the water is moving at 1.887 gallons per minute. I would think from there you could just calculate it as if the pipe was a long cylinder with no flow rate Ignoring friction heat, etc. although I would assume as the heat transfers you would start to get turbulence inside the pipe and in the tank as convection begins moving the water around. In the tank, if the pipe was suspended in the middle (not laying on the floor of the tank), the cooler water would sink being replaced with the more plentiful warmer water. In the pipe the top would be warmer than the bottom, but with flowing water I would suspect more turbulence and a better temperature distribution within the pipe? I would like to calculate the total temperature change in the pipe over 1 minute.

Water in pipe = 40 degrees F
Water in larger tank = 50 degrees F

Water in pipe after one minute = ? degrees F (and I would actually like to know how to do it myself. :) Like they always told me in school... show your work. lol I want to come away from this a little smarter than going in.

Any suggestion, corrections, etc. are very welcome. College physics was 20 years ago and to my detriment I had very little interest in any class let alone physics. :(

Thanks in advance for any input...
-Steve

Equality of expectation value integral over coordinate space and over energy

$
0
0
Dear all,

I'm wondering, how one could justify mathematically the equality
[itex]\int O(E(\vec{x}_1,...\vec{x}_N)) exp(-\beta E(\vec{x}_1,...,\vec{x}_N)) d\vec{x}_1...d\vec{x}_N[/itex] = [itex]\int g(E) O(E) exp(-\beta E) dE[/itex]

where O(E(x)) is an observable and g(E) the density of states.

Is there a mathematical justification for the equality?

best,
derivator
Viewing all 57941 articles
Browse latest View live